The Acute Vestibular Syndrome and HINTS Examination: A Bedside Clinical Paradigm for Stroke Detection

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) presents a diagnostic challenge in emergency and acute care settings, as benign peripheral vestibular disorders and life-threatening posterior circulation strokes can present with nearly identical symptoms. The Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew (HINTS) examination represents a paradigm shift in acute stroke diagnosis, demonstrating superior sensitivity to early MRI diffusion-weighted imaging for detecting posterior circulation infarction. This review examines the pathophysiology, clinical application, and evidence base for the HINTS examination, providing practical guidance for postgraduate physicians in internal medicine. Understanding and properly executing this bedside examination can be life-saving, as it enables early identification of patients requiring urgent neuroimaging and intervention.

Introduction

The patient presenting with acute onset vertigo, nausea, vomiting, and gait instability represents one of the most consequential diagnostic challenges in acute medicine. The central question—is this a benign peripheral vestibular disorder or a potentially fatal stroke—must often be answered within the therapeutic window for intervention. Traditional approaches relying on clinical gestalt or neuroimaging have significant limitations, creating a critical gap that the HINTS examination elegantly fills.

Acute vestibular syndrome is defined as the rapid onset of sustained vertigo or dizziness with nystagmus, nausea, vomiting, gait instability, head motion intolerance, and a general preference to remain motionless. When these symptoms arise suddenly and persist for at least 24 hours, the clinician faces a binary decision tree with vastly different implications: peripheral vestibular neuritis (a self-limited condition) or posterior circulation stroke (a neurologic emergency).

The Clinical Imperative: Why MRI Is Not Enough

A critical pearl that many clinicians fail to appreciate is the limited sensitivity of MRI in the hyperacute phase of posterior circulation stroke. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), long considered the gold standard for stroke detection, has a sensitivity of only 50% for posterior circulation strokes within the first 24 hours of symptom onset, increasing to approximately 80% at 48 hours. This delayed sensitivity is particularly pronounced in small brainstem and cerebellar infarctions—precisely the strokes that present as AVS.

The seminal work by Kattah and colleagues in 2009 demonstrated that the HINTS examination had 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity for identifying stroke in AVS patients, outperforming MRI obtained within 48 hours. This remarkable finding challenges the reflexive ordering of neuroimaging and elevates the physical examination to its rightful place as the primary diagnostic modality in this specific clinical context.

Clinical Pearl: A negative MRI in the first 24 hours does not exclude stroke in a patient with AVS. The HINTS examination is more reliable during this critical window.

Pathophysiologic Foundation

Understanding the neuroanatomy underlying the HINTS examination enhances both its execution and interpretation. The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is a three-neuron arc that stabilizes vision during head movement. The peripheral vestibular apparatus detects angular acceleration, transmits signals via the vestibular nerve to the vestibular nucleus in the brainstem, which then projects to the contralateral abducens nucleus and the ipsilateral oculomotor nucleus via the medial longitudinal fasciculus.

In vestibular neuritis, inflammatory injury to the vestibular nerve creates an imbalance between the two peripheral vestibular systems. The brain misinterprets this as continuous rotation, generating compensatory nystagmus and vertigo. The VOR itself remains functional but asymmetric—the affected side produces a deficient response during head impulse testing.

In contrast, posterior circulation strokes affecting the brainstem or cerebellum damage central vestibular structures. These lesions may spare the VOR pathway while disrupting other brainstem circuits, producing central oculomotor signs such as skew deviation or direction-changing nystagmus. Small cerebellar strokes, particularly in the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) or posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) distributions, can present identically to vestibular neuritis except for subtle differences detectable by the HINTS examination.

The HINTS Examination: Technical Execution

The HINTS acronym stands for Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew. Each component must be performed correctly to avoid false positive or false negative results. The examination should be performed in a well-lit room with the patient seated and alert enough to cooperate.

Head Impulse Test (HIT)

The head impulse test, also known as the Halmagyi-Curthoys test, assesses the VOR. The examiner stands directly in front of the patient at arm's length.

Technique:

1. Instruct the patient to maintain visual fixation on the examiner's nose throughout the maneuver
2. Grasp the patient's head firmly with both hands on either side
3. Rotate the head approximately 10-20 degrees to one side with an unpredictable, rapid movement (the velocity is critical—it must be fast enough to activate the VOR)
4. Observe the patient's eyes during and immediately after the head movement
5. Return the head to center and repeat to the opposite side
6. Perform multiple repetitions in each direction

Interpretation:

• Abnormal (positive) test: A corrective saccade (rapid eye movement back to the target) indicates peripheral vestibular dysfunction. The deficient vestibular system cannot maintain fixation during the head turn, and the eyes move with the head, requiring a visible saccade to reacquire the target.
• Normal (negative) test: The eyes remain fixed on the target throughout the maneuver, indicating intact VOR bilaterally. In the context of AVS, this suggests a central lesion.

Critical Hack: The corrective saccade may be overt (visible to the naked eye after the head movement) or covert (occurring during the head movement and harder to detect). Covert saccades require video-oculography or careful observation to identify. When in doubt, assume the test is normal and assign central pathology.

Common Pitfalls:

• Insufficient velocity (must be brisk and unpredictable)
• Testing through too large an angle (should be 10-20 degrees, not 45 degrees)
• Patient anticipation (undermines the purpose of catching the VOR unprepared)
• Not repeating the test multiple times in each direction

Nystagmus Assessment

Nystagmus in AVS reflects the tonic imbalance between the two vestibular systems. Its characteristics distinguish peripheral from central pathology.

Technique:

1. Assess spontaneous nystagmus in primary gaze (looking straight ahead)
2. Test nystagmus in left, right, up, and down gaze positions
3. Hold each gaze position for at least 10 seconds
4. Document the direction of the fast phase in each position
5. Note any change in direction with gaze position

Interpretation:

• Peripheral pattern: Horizontal or horizontal-torsional nystagmus that is unidirectional (fast phase always beats in the same direction regardless of gaze position). The nystagmus beats away from the affected ear and may be enhanced by gaze in the direction of the fast phase (Alexander's law).
• Central pattern: Any of the following indicate central pathology:
  • Pure vertical nystagmus
  • Pure torsional nystagmus
  • Direction-changing nystagmus (fast phase changes direction with gaze position—e.g., left-beating in left gaze, right-beating in right gaze)
  • Nystagmus absent in primary gaze but present in eccentric gaze

Clinical Pearl: Direction-changing gaze-evoked nystagmus is highly specific for central pathology. When present in AVS, it virtually confirms stroke.

Oyster: Peripheral vestibular nystagmus may be suppressed by visual fixation. If you don't see spontaneous nystagmus initially, try using Frenzel goggles (magnifying glasses with internal illumination that prevent fixation) or simply observe in darkness with an ophthalmoscope to detect subtle nystagmus.

Test of Skew Deviation (Alternate Cover Test)

Skew deviation is a vertical misalignment of the ocular axes caused by imbalanced vestibular input to the brainstem structures controlling vertical gaze. It indicates central pathology.

Technique:

1. Position yourself directly in front of the patient at eye level
2. Instruct the patient to fixate on your nose
3. Cover one of the patient's eyes with an occluder or your palm
4. Wait 2-3 seconds, then quickly uncover that eye while simultaneously covering the other eye
5. Watch for vertical movement of the eyes as they shift fixation
6. Repeat the maneuver multiple times, alternating coverage

Interpretation:

• Normal (negative) test: No vertical movement of either eye during the cover-uncover sequence
• Abnormal (positive) test: One eye moves vertically (up or down) to reacquire fixation when uncovered, indicating skew deviation. This strongly suggests central pathology.

Technical Hack: The key is alternating coverage quickly enough that the patient cannot simply look down while covered. The uncovering should reveal the eye's resting position during binocular vision interruption. If you see vertical refixation movement, the test is positive.

Common Pitfall: Don't confuse horizontal refixation movements (which can occur in patients with strabismus or diplopia from other causes) with the vertical skew deviation. Only vertical misalignment counts as a positive test.

The INFARCT Mnemonic

A useful mnemonic for remembering the central (stroke) pattern is INFARCT:

• Impulse Normal (negative head impulse test)
• Nystagmus direction-changing or vertical
• Fast-phase Alternating (direction-changing nystagmus)
• Refixation on Cover Test (positive skew deviation)
• Central lesion
• Think stroke

When any component of the HINTS examination suggests central pathology, the patient should be presumed to have a stroke until proven otherwise. The combination of findings is highly specific—if all three tests point to peripheral pathology, stroke is unlikely. If any test suggests central pathology, stroke risk is high.

Evidence Base and Clinical Validation

The diagnostic accuracy of the HINTS examination has been validated across multiple studies. The original study by Kattah et al. enrolled 101 patients with AVS and found that the combination of a normal head impulse test, direction-changing nystagmus, or skew deviation had 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity for stroke. Importantly, this performance exceeded that of early MRI-DWI.

Subsequent studies have confirmed these findings with some caveats. A 2013 study by Tarnutzer and colleagues demonstrated similar accuracy when the examination was performed by trained neuro-ophthalmologists and stroke neurologists. However, a critical limitation emerged when examining the test characteristics in the hands of general emergency physicians: the sensitivity dropped significantly, likely due to incorrect test execution, particularly of the head impulse test.

The AVERT trial and other prospective studies have reinforced that HINTS is most accurate when:

1. The patient has continuous symptoms at the time of examination
2. The examination is performed by a trained clinician
3. All three components are assessed systematically
4. The acute vestibular syndrome criteria are strictly met

Oyster: The HINTS examination is only validated for patients with the acute vestibular syndrome (continuous symptoms). It should not be applied to patients with episodic vertigo (such as benign paroxysmal positional vertigo) or those with focal neurologic deficits (who already meet stroke criteria).

Clinical Application and Decision-Making

When evaluating a patient with AVS, the HINTS examination should be integrated into a broader clinical assessment. Consider the following structured approach:

Step 1: Confirm Acute Vestibular Syndrome

Ensure the patient has:

• Acute onset (not episodic)
• Sustained vertigo or dizziness
• Nystagmus
• Nausea/vomiting
• Gait instability
• Symptoms present for at least 24 hours
• Absence of focal neurologic deficits (if present, presume stroke)

Step 2: Perform HINTS Examination

Execute all three components carefully:

• Head impulse test bilaterally
• Nystagmus assessment in all gaze positions
• Test of skew deviation

Step 3: Interpret Results

• All tests point to peripheral: Head impulse abnormal (corrective saccade), nystagmus unidirectional horizontal, no skew deviation
  • Likely vestibular neuritis
  • Consider audiology referral and symptomatic treatment
  • Neuroimaging may be deferred in low-risk patients
• Any test points to central: Normal head impulse, direction-changing nystagmus, or skew deviation
  • Presume stroke until proven otherwise
  • Urgent neurology consultation
  • MRI with DWI (understanding limitations of early imaging)
  • Consider admission for monitoring
  • Assess for thrombolysis or thrombectomy eligibility

Step 4: Risk Stratification

Incorporate vascular risk factors:

• Age over 50
• Hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia
• Known cardiovascular disease
• Current smoking
• Prior stroke or TIA

High-risk patients with a "peripheral" HINTS examination should still receive neuroimaging given the potential for false negatives in less experienced hands.

Special Populations and Caveats

Posterior Circulation TIA

Patients with transient symptoms that have resolved at the time of presentation cannot be assessed with the HINTS examination, as the vestibular signs may have disappeared. These patients require risk stratification using clinical scoring systems (such as ABCD2) and typically warrant neuroimaging and admission.

Cerebellar Hemorrhage

While the HINTS examination was developed and validated for ischemic stroke, cerebellar hemorrhage can present identically as AVS. The same central signs apply—any positive HINTS finding should prompt urgent neuroimaging to differentiate infarction from hemorrhage, as management differs significantly.

Recurrent Vestibular Neuritis

Patients with a documented history of vestibular neuritis may experience recurrent episodes. However, each episode of AVS should be approached de novo with the HINTS examination, as recurrent peripheral events do not exclude concurrent central pathology, particularly in patients with vascular risk factors.

AICA Syndrome

Anterior inferior cerebellar artery strokes present a particular diagnostic challenge because they can cause damage to both the lateral pontomedullary structures and the inner ear (via the labyrinthine artery). These patients may have an abnormal head impulse test (mimicking peripheral vestibular neuritis) along with other brainstem signs. The key differentiator is often associated findings such as facial numbness, hearing loss ipsilateral to the abnormal head impulse, or Horner syndrome.

Pearl: In AICA syndrome, the head impulse test may be abnormal, but accompanying features (facial weakness, hearing loss, ataxia) should prompt neuroimaging. When in doubt, image.

Common Diagnostic Errors and How to Avoid Them

Error 1: Misapplying HINTS to Episodic Vertigo

The HINTS examination is only validated for AVS (continuous symptoms). Do not use it for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), Meniere's disease, or other episodic conditions. Use the Dix-Hallpike maneuver for suspected BPPV instead.

Error 2: Poor Head Impulse Technique

The most common source of false negatives is inadequate velocity during the head impulse test. The movement must be brisk and unpredictable. Practice is essential—consider training with video-assisted head impulse testing (vHIT) to calibrate your technique.

Error 3: Relying on Imaging Instead of Examination

Many clinicians reflexively order MRI and falsely reassure themselves when the initial study is negative. Remember that early MRI has only 50% sensitivity for posterior circulation stroke. The HINTS examination should guide decision-making, not the imaging.

Error 4: Missing Subtle Skew Deviation

The vertical misalignment in skew deviation may be subtle (1-2 mm). Careful observation and multiple repetitions of the alternate cover test are necessary. If you think you see something, you probably do—err on the side of caution and presume central pathology.

Error 5: Ignoring High-Risk Features

Even a "peripheral" HINTS examination should not completely exclude stroke in a patient with high vascular risk. The combination of clinical judgment, risk stratification, and HINTS examination provides the best sensitivity and specificity.

Treatment Implications

Peripheral Vestibular Neuritis

Patients with a peripheral HINTS examination and low vascular risk can typically be managed as outpatients with:

• Vestibular suppressants (meclizine, dimenhydrinate) for acute symptom relief (short-term only—do not suppress vestibular rehabilitation)
• Antiemetics as needed
• Early vestibular rehabilitation (once acute symptoms subside)
• Glucocorticoids (controversial—methylprednisolone may improve vestibular recovery if given early)
• Reassurance about the benign nature and expected recovery timeline (days to weeks)

Central Pathology (Presumed Stroke)

Patients with any central signs require:

• Urgent neurology consultation
• Blood pressure management (avoid aggressive reduction unless hypertensive emergency)
• MRI brain with DWI and MRA (head and neck)
• Consideration for reperfusion therapy if within appropriate time window
• Admission for monitoring (risk of edema and herniation with cerebellar strokes)
• Secondary stroke prevention measures

Critical Pearl: Cerebellar strokes carry significant risk of edema with mass effect, potentially causing obstructive hydrocephalus or brainstem compression. Patients require close neurologic monitoring and neurosurgical consultation for potential posterior fossa decompression.

Teaching the HINTS Examination

For postgraduate trainees, mastering the HINTS examination requires deliberate practice. Recommendations include:

1. Observe experienced clinicians performing the examination
2. Practice the head impulse test on healthy volunteers to develop the appropriate velocity
3. Review video examples of normal and abnormal tests
4. Perform supervised examinations on patients with known pathology
5. Consider simulation-based training modules

The emergency medicine and neurology literature contains excellent video demonstrations that should be integrated into teaching sessions. Competency can be assessed through objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) or workplace-based assessments.

Future Directions and Research

Video-assisted head impulse testing (vHIT) offers quantitative measurement of VOR gain and can detect covert saccades invisible to the naked eye. While not yet standard in emergency settings, vHIT may eventually enhance the sensitivity and accessibility of the head impulse test component.

Handheld portable MRI devices are under development and may eventually provide point-of-care imaging in emergency departments. However, the fundamental issue remains—early posterior circulation strokes may be MRI-negative, and the clinical examination will retain its primacy.

Machine learning algorithms applied to oculomotor recordings show promise for automated interpretation of the HINTS examination, potentially reducing the barrier of technical expertise. Such tools could democratize access to this life-saving diagnostic approach.

Conclusion

The HINTS examination represents a triumph of clinical neurology—a bedside examination that outperforms advanced neuroimaging for a critical diagnosis. For the postgraduate physician in internal medicine, mastering this examination is essential for competent management of acute vestibular syndrome.

The key principles bear repeating: AVS is a continuous syndrome, not episodic vertigo. The HINTS examination requires proper technique, particularly for the head impulse test. Any central sign (normal head impulse, direction-changing nystagmus, or skew deviation) warrants presumption of stroke and urgent intervention. Early MRI may be falsely negative and should not provide false reassurance.

By integrating the HINTS examination into clinical practice, physicians can identify posterior circulation strokes during the critical therapeutic window, potentially preventing devastating neurologic outcomes. This bedside examination exemplifies the enduring power of careful clinical observation and reminds us that the most advanced diagnostic tool remains the well-trained physician at the patient's bedside.

Key Takeaways for Clinical Practice

1. HINTS is more sensitive than early MRI for posterior circulation stroke in AVS
2. Master the head impulse test technique—velocity and unpredictability are critical
3. Direction-changing nystagmus virtually confirms central pathology
4. Any central sign = presumed stroke requiring urgent evaluation
5. Only apply HINTS to continuous AVS, not episodic vertigo
6. High vascular risk may warrant imaging even with peripheral HINTS
7. Cerebellar strokes require close monitoring for mass effect
8. Practice and training are essential for examination accuracy

References

1. Kattah JC, Talkad AV, Wang DZ, Hsieh YH, Newman-Toker DE. HINTS to diagnose stroke in the acute vestibular syndrome: three-step bedside oculomotor examination more sensitive than early MRI diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 2009;40(11):3504-3510.

2. Newman-Toker DE, Kerber KA, Hsieh YH, et al. HINTS outperforms ABCD2 to screen for stroke in acute continuous vertigo and dizziness. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(10):986-996.

3. Tarnutzer AA, Berkowitz AL, Robinson KA, Hsieh YH, Newman-Toker DE. Does my dizzy patient have a stroke? A systematic review of bedside diagnosis in acute vestibular syndrome. CMAJ. 2011;183(9):E571-E592.

4. Edlow JA, Gurley KL, Newman-Toker DE. A new diagnostic approach to the adult patient with acute dizziness. J Emerg Med. 2018;54(4):469-483.

5. Kerber KA, Brown DL, Lisabeth LD, Smith MA, Morgenstern LB. Stroke among patients with dizziness, vertigo, and imbalance in the emergency department: a population-based study. Stroke. 2006;37(10):2484-2487.

6. Chen L, Lee W, Chambers BR, Dewey HM. Diagnostic accuracy of acute vestibular syndrome at the bedside in a stroke unit. J Neurol. 2011;258(5):855-861.

7. Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS. A clinical sign of canal paresis. Arch Neurol. 1988;45(7):737-739.

8. Newman-Toker DE, Edlow JA. TiTrATE: A novel, evidence-based approach to diagnosing acute dizziness and vertigo. Neurol Clin. 2015;33(3):577-599.

9. Carmona S, Martínez C, Zalazar G, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of truncal ataxia and HINTS as cardinal signs for acute vestibular syndrome. Front Neurol. 2016;7:125.

10. Saber Tehrani AS, Kattah JC, Kerber KA, et al. Diagnosing stroke in acute dizziness and vertigo: pitfalls and pearls. Stroke. 2018;49(3):788-795.