Discharge Against Medical Advice: A Comprehensive Review

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Discharge against medical advice (AMA) represents a complex intersection of patient autonomy, clinical risk management, and medico-legal responsibility. With AMA discharge rates ranging from 1-2% of all hospitalizations, this phenomenon creates significant challenges for healthcare teams and substantially increases patient morbidity and mortality. This review examines the epidemiology, risk factors, ethical considerations, and evidence-based protocols for managing AMA discharges in internal medicine practice.

Introduction

The phrase "I'm leaving AMA" echoes through hospital corridors with predictable regularity, often accompanied by a familiar script that experienced clinicians can anticipate. While the surface-level frustrations of AMA discharges may inspire gallows humor among healthcare teams, the underlying reality demands serious consideration. Patients who leave AMA face readmission rates of 20-40% and mortality rates 10% higher than those who complete recommended treatment.¹⁻³ Understanding the multifaceted nature of this clinical scenario is essential for internal medicine trainees.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence and Prevalence

Approximately 1-2% of all hospital discharges occur against medical advice, translating to over 500,000 cases annually in the United States alone.⁴ However, this rate varies significantly by patient population and clinical setting, with some urban safety-net hospitals reporting AMA rates as high as 6-8%.⁵

High-Risk Populations

Research consistently identifies specific demographic and clinical characteristics associated with increased AMA discharge risk:

Socioeconomic Factors:

• Uninsured or underinsured patients (odds ratio 2.1-3.4)⁶
• Homelessness or unstable housing (odds ratio 4.2)⁷
• Lower educational attainment
• Limited social support systems

Substance Use Disorders:

• Active substance use disorder represents the single strongest predictor of AMA discharge (odds ratio 5.8-12.4)⁸⁻⁹
• Alcohol use disorder increases AMA risk 3-4 fold¹⁰
• Opioid use disorder patients leave AMA at rates exceeding 15% in some studies¹¹

Psychiatric Comorbidity:

• Depression and anxiety disorders (odds ratio 2.3)¹²
• Severe mental illness including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (odds ratio 3.1-4.7)¹³
• Personality disorders, particularly borderline and antisocial types

Clinical Characteristics:

• Younger age (18-45 years)¹⁴
• Male gender (odds ratio 1.5-2.0)¹⁵
• Previous AMA discharges (strongest predictor of future AMA, odds ratio 8-15)¹⁶
• Longer anticipated hospital stay
• ICU admission requirements

The Psychology of Leaving AMA: Understanding the "Bingo Card"

Common Expressed Reasons

While the stereotypical "AMA Bingo Card" contains elements of dark humor familiar to experienced clinicians, each phrase reflects genuine patient concerns:

Autonomy Assertions:

• "I have rights!" - Often reflects perceived loss of control and agency
• "I know my body" - May indicate poor health literacy or previous negative healthcare experiences
• "You're just keeping me for the money" - Suggests distrust of healthcare system and potential financial anxiety

External Pressures:

• "My dog needs me" / "My kids need me" - Real caregiving responsibilities that hospital systems often fail to accommodate
• Employment concerns and fear of job loss
• Housing insecurity requiring physical presence

Addiction-Related:

• "I need a cigarette" - Nicotine withdrawal management remains inadequate in most hospital settings
• Unaddressed substance withdrawal or craving
• Inadequate pain management leading to self-medication seeking

System Failures:

• "I'm going to a real hospital" - May reflect communication breakdowns, perceived dismissal of symptoms, or cultural insensitivity
• Long wait times and ED boarding
• Inadequate pain or symptom control

Pearl #1: The "Bingo Card" as Diagnostic Tool

Rather than dismissing common AMA phrases as mere annoyance, astute clinicians recognize them as diagnostic clues. "I need a cigarette" might indicate undertreated nicotine dependence requiring immediate nicotine replacement. "My kids need me" reveals unaddressed social needs requiring social work intervention. "You're keeping me for money" suggests deep distrust requiring relationship repair before medical discussion can proceed effectively.

Clinical Outcomes and Consequences

Mortality and Morbidity

The consequences of AMA discharge extend far beyond institutional metrics:

• 30-day readmission rates: 20-40% compared to 8-15% for standard discharge¹⁷⁻¹⁸
• Mortality increase: 10% higher at 30 days, 33% higher at 6 months¹⁹
• Disease-specific risks:
  • Acute coronary syndrome: 2.7-fold increased mortality²⁰
  • Pneumonia: 2.1-fold increased mortality²¹
  • Sepsis: 3.2-fold increased mortality²²

Healthcare System Impact

• Increased healthcare costs due to preventable readmissions²³
• Emergency department overcrowding from repeated presentations
• Decreased continuity of care
• Provider moral distress and burnout²⁴

Pearl #2: The "Specific Consequence" Rule

When discussing risks with patients considering AMA discharge, avoid generic warnings. Replace "You could get worse" with "The bacteria in your leg could spread to your blood within 24-48 hours, causing shock that drops your blood pressure dangerously low." Specific, concrete consequences resonate more effectively than vague medical terminology. Use the 8th-grade reading level rule: simple words, short sentences, vivid imagery.

Ethical and Legal Framework

Autonomy vs. Beneficence

AMA discharges exist at the tension point between two fundamental ethical principles:

Patient Autonomy: Competent adults possess the right to refuse medical treatment, even when refusal contradicts medical advice or threatens life. This principle, rooted in informed consent doctrine and the legal right to bodily integrity, forms the bedrock of modern medical ethics.²⁵

Beneficence/Non-maleficence: Physicians bear ethical obligations to act in patients' best interests and prevent harm. This creates internal conflict when autonomous choices clearly threaten patient welfare.

Capacity Assessment

Critical Distinction: Decision-making capacity differs from legal competency. Capacity represents a clinical determination made by treating physicians; competency requires judicial determination.²⁶

Four Components of Decision-Making Capacity:

1. Understanding: Can patient comprehend diagnosis, treatment options, and consequences?
2. Appreciation: Does patient recognize how information applies specifically to them?
3. Reasoning: Can patient manipulate information rationally and compare options?
4. Communication: Can patient clearly express a consistent choice?

Situational Nature: Capacity is decision-specific and fluctuating. A patient may possess capacity to refuse antibiotics but lack capacity regarding complex surgical decisions.

Oyster #1: The Capacity Gray Zone

Most AMA situations don't involve clear incapacity. More commonly, you encounter the "gray zone" patient: intoxicated but conversational, delirious but intermittently lucid, or severely depressed but superficially logical. Here's the hack: Document your capacity assessment formally every time. Use phrases like "Patient demonstrates understanding by stating [repeat patient's words]. Patient appreciates personal relevance by acknowledging [specific statement]. Patient's reasoning process involves [describe]. Patient consistently communicates decision to leave." This documentation protects you medico-legally while forcing a structured evaluation that might reveal subtle capacity deficits.

Legal Considerations

Medical Malpractice Concerns: Physicians cannot be held liable for outcomes resulting from patients' informed refusal of care, provided:

• Patient possessed decision-making capacity
• Patient received adequate information about risks
• Documentation is thorough and contemporaneous²⁷

Exceptions to Autonomy:

• Lack of decision-making capacity
• Danger to self or others (psychiatric hold criteria)
• Communicable disease requiring public health intervention
• Minor status (with exceptions for emancipated minors)

Hack #1: The "Attending Shield"

Always involve the attending physician before finalizing AMA discharge. This serves multiple functions: (1) attending may succeed where resident failed due to experience or relationship; (2) distributes medico-legal risk appropriately up the hierarchy; (3) ensures senior oversight of high-risk decision; (4) protects resident from potential allegations of inadequate counseling. Document: "Attending Dr. [Name] personally counseled patient regarding risks. Patient expressed understanding and maintained decision to leave."

Evidence-Based Protocol for AMA Discharges

Step 1: Initial Response and Pause

When a patient announces intention to leave AMA:

Immediate Actions:

• Remain calm and non-judgmental
• Avoid power struggles or emotional reactions
• State: "I hear you want to leave. Before you go, let's talk for a few minutes about what's happening."
• Buy time for assessment and intervention

Step 2: Explore Underlying Reasons

**Motivational Interviewing Techniques:**²⁸

• Open-ended questions: "Help me understand what's making you want to leave right now?"
• Reflective listening: "It sounds like you're frustrated because..."
• Avoid argumentation or confrontation
• Express empathy and partnership

Address Remediable Concerns:

• Inadequate symptom control → immediate pain/nausea reassessment
• Communication breakdown → bring attending to repair relationship
• Nicotine withdrawal → urgent nicotine replacement
• Childcare concerns → expedited social work consultation
• Financial anxiety → financial counseling referral

Pearl #3: The 15-Minute Rule

Studies demonstrate that 25-40% of AMA intentions resolve with brief, empathetic intervention.²⁹ Invest 15 focused minutes before escalating. Many residents rush to documentation when slowing down pays dividends. Ask yourself: "Have I truly addressed why they want to leave, or just told them why they should stay?"

Step 3: Capacity Assessment

Formal Evaluation:

• Assess for acute intoxication, delirium, or psychosis
• Perform mini-mental status examination if indicated
• Document assessment in four-component framework
• Consult psychiatry for borderline cases

If Capacity Lacking:

• Patient cannot leave AMA
• Implement appropriate hold (medical or psychiatric depending on etiology)
• Contact surrogate decision-maker
• Document incapacity thoroughly

Step 4: The "Danger Talk"

Structure of Effective Risk Disclosure:

"Mr. Johnson, I need to be very direct with you about the medical risks of leaving right now:

[Specific diagnosis]: You have a serious infection in your leg called cellulitis.

[Specific risk]: If you leave without completing IV antibiotics, the bacteria can spread into your bloodstream within 24-48 hours.

[Specific consequence]: This blood infection, called sepsis, can cause your blood pressure to drop dangerously low, leading to organ damage or death.

[Immediate timeframe]: This could happen within the next day or two, not weeks from now.

[Question]: Knowing this risk, are you willing to accept the possibility of dying to leave the hospital today?"

Critical Elements:

• Use lay terminology (avoid medical jargon)
• Provide specific timeframes (not "eventually")
• Focus on most immediate/serious risk (not comprehensive differential)
• Frame as question requiring acknowledgment
• Maintain professional, non-coercive tone³⁰

Hack #2: The Witness Protocol

Always have a witness present during the final AMA discussion—preferably the nurse caring for the patient. Benefits: (1) corroboration of your documentation; (2) second person to attempt persuasion; (3) nursing perspective may identify different leverage points; (4) distributes emotional burden of difficult encounter. Document: "Discussion conducted in presence of RN [Name] who can corroborate patient's statements and understanding."

Step 5: Documentation

**Essential Documentation Elements:**³¹

1. Capacity Assessment: Explicitly document four-component evaluation
2. Verbatim Quotes: Record patient's exact words explaining decision and acknowledging risks
3. Risk Disclosure: List specific risks discussed
4. Witness: Name witnesses present
5. Attending Involvement: Document attending physician counseling
6. Alternatives Offered: Document all attempts to address concerns
7. Harm Reduction: Document provision of prescriptions, follow-up, wound care supplies

Example Documentation:

"Patient insists on leaving hospital before completing recommended course of IV antibiotics for MRSA bacteremia. Decision-making capacity formally assessed: Patient demonstrates understanding of diagnosis by stating 'I have a blood infection that needs IV antibiotics.' Patient appreciates personal risk by stating 'I know this is serious and could get worse.' Patient provides reasoning: 'My mother has dementia and there's no one else to check on her today.' Patient consistently communicates decision to leave.

Attending Dr. Smith and I counseled patient extensively. Specifically discussed risk of persistent bacteremia leading to endocarditis, septic shock, metastatic abscess formation, and death. Timeframe of 48-72 hours for deterioration explained. Patient states 'I understand I could die, but I have to see my mother today.'

Discussion conducted in presence of RN Jones. Patient offered social work consultation for alternative caregiving arrangements—declined. Offered outpatient IV therapy—declined. Offered transfer to facility near mother—declined.

Provided 7-day course of oral linezolid 600mg BID, wound care supplies, and follow-up appointment in Infectious Disease clinic in 2 days. Written discharge instructions with return precautions provided. Patient verbalized understanding of when to return to ED.

Patient signed AMA form and left in stable condition at 1430."

Oyster #2: The Discharge Instructions Paradox

Here's a nuanced point many miss: Providing discharge prescriptions and follow-up appointments to AMA patients feels paradoxical—they're refusing your care, so why facilitate partial adherence? The answer: harm reduction. A patient taking oral antibiotics has better outcomes than one taking nothing. A patient with follow-up scheduled has higher care re-engagement than one without. You're not condoning the decision; you're minimizing preventable harm.³² This also strengthens medico-legal protection by demonstrating continued beneficence despite patient refusal.

Step 6: The AMA Form

Purpose and Limitations:

The AMA form serves to document patient acknowledgment of risk; it does NOT:

• Transfer liability from physician to patient
• Function as a legal waiver protecting physician from negligence claims
• Replace thorough documentation in medical record³³

Best Practices:

• Never coerce signature
• If patient refuses to sign, document this refusal
• Unsigned AMA discharge is legally and ethically identical to signed discharge
• Form is supplementary to, not replacement for, chart documentation

Pearl #4: The Unsigned Form Myth

Many residents panic when patients refuse to sign AMA paperwork. Relax. The form doesn't protect you—your documentation does. If a patient refuses to sign, simply document: "Patient declined to sign AMA form. Stated '[verbatim quote].' Patient departed at [time]." You've fulfilled your obligations. Never physically prevent a patient with capacity from leaving due to unsigned paperwork.

Special Populations and Scenarios

Substance Use Disorders

Evidence-Based Interventions:

• Initiate medication-assisted treatment (MAT) during hospitalization³⁴
• Buprenorphine for opioid use disorder started inpatient reduces AMA rates by 40%³⁵
• Consult addiction medicine early in admission
• Address withdrawal symptoms aggressively
• Provide harm reduction supplies (naloxone, clean needles where legal)
• Connect to outpatient addiction services before discharge

Psychiatric Comorbidity

Key Considerations:

• Differentiate medical from psychiatric capacity questions
• Psychiatric holds don't authorize medical treatment without separate capacity determination
• Consult psychiatry for involuntary hold evaluation if danger to self/others
• Treat underlying psychiatric condition alongside medical illness
• Screen for suicidality in AMA context

Patients with Previous AMA Discharges

Risk Mitigation Strategies:

• Identify repeat AMA patients on admission
• Proactive care plan addressing previous barriers
• Early interdisciplinary team meeting
• Consider shorter antibiotic courses, early transition to oral therapy
• Enhanced social work involvement from admission

Hack #3: The "AMA Prevention Consult"

For patients with multiple previous AMA discharges, place an early "AMA prevention consult" to social work, case management, or patient advocacy. Frame it as "This patient has left AMA from three previous admissions. Please help us identify and address barriers to completing treatment this time." Proactive intervention beats reactive crisis management.

System-Level Interventions

Hospital Policy Development

**Evidence-Based Policy Components:**³⁶

• Standardized AMA documentation forms
• Mandatory attending notification
• Required capacity assessment protocol
• Social work automatic consultation
• Harm reduction supply provision
• Follow-up appointment scheduling for all AMA patients

Quality Improvement Initiatives

Strategies to Reduce AMA Rates:

• Nicotine replacement therapy order sets
• Buprenorphine initiation protocols
• Patient experience improvement initiatives
• Cultural competency training
• Reduced ED boarding times
• Enhanced pain management protocols

Pearl #5: The Institutional AMA Audit

Advocate for your institution to conduct regular AMA audits examining: demographics, reasons for discharge, time of day patterns, provider-specific rates, and outcomes. These data reveal system failures (e.g., all AMA discharges occurring during shift change suggesting communication failures) and guide targeted interventions. As trainees, you can present such QI projects at conferences.

Teaching Points for Trainees

Communication Skills

Phrases That Help:

• "Help me understand what's most important to you right now."
• "I'm worried about you, and I want to make sure you're safe."
• "What would need to change for you to stay?"
• "Even if you decide to leave, I still want to help you as much as possible."

Phrases to Avoid:

• "You're making a huge mistake."
• "If you leave, don't come back."
• "I'm not responsible for what happens to you."
• "You're just going to get high/drunk."
• "You're wasting our time."

Oyster #3: The Emotional Regulation Challenge

AMA situations provoke strong emotions in providers: frustration, anger, helplessness, guilt. Recognize these as normal but manage them professionally. A patient leaving AMA after you've worked 30 hours to stabilize them feels personal. It isn't. Their decision reflects their circumstances, not your worth as a physician. Process these emotions with peers, not with the patient. Maintaining composure and compassion despite personal frustration represents advanced professional development.

Medico-Legal Protection

Your Legal Shields:

1. Thorough documentation (most important)
2. Attending involvement
3. Witnessed discussion
4. Capacity assessment
5. Specific risk disclosure
6. Harm reduction efforts

Red Flags (Actions That Increase Liability):

• Inadequate documentation
• Failure to assess capacity
• No attending notification
• Coercive or judgmental language
• Preventing competent patient from leaving
• No risk disclosure

Conclusion

Discharge against medical advice represents one of internal medicine's most challenging scenarios, requiring integration of clinical knowledge, communication skills, ethical reasoning, and legal awareness. While the predictable patterns of AMA situations may inspire dark humor among healthcare teams, each case involves a vulnerable individual making a decision shaped by complex psychosocial forces.

The key to managing AMA discharges lies not in preventing all such discharges—an impossible goal—but in approaching each situation with empathy, thoroughness, and harm reduction principles. By understanding the epidemiology, recognizing high-risk populations, mastering capacity assessment, implementing evidence-based protocols, and documenting meticulously, internal medicine trainees can navigate these difficult encounters while protecting both patients and themselves.

Remember: A patient leaving AMA doesn't represent your failure. It represents their autonomy, exercised in difficult circumstances. Your job is to respect that autonomy while minimizing harm and maintaining your professional integrity. Done well, an AMA discharge can paradoxically strengthen the therapeutic relationship, leaving the door open for future engagement when the patient is ready to accept care.

Key Takeaways

1. AMA discharges affect 1-2% of admissions but carry disproportionate risk with 20-40% readmission rates
2. High-risk populations include those with substance use disorders, psychiatric comorbidity, homelessness, and previous AMA history
3. Capacity assessment using the four-component model is mandatory and must be documented
4. Specific, concrete risk disclosure is more effective than generic warnings
5. Always involve the attending physician in AMA decisions
6. Documentation protects more than forms—use verbatim quotes and witness presence
7. Harm reduction (prescriptions, follow-up, supplies) reduces adverse outcomes even after AMA discharge
8. System-level interventions addressing nicotine withdrawal, addiction treatment, and social needs reduce AMA rates
9. Maintaining professional composure and empathy despite frustration represents advanced clinical skill
10. Patients retain the right to make "bad" decisions—your job is informed consent, not coercion

References

1. Southern WN, Nahvi S, Arnsten JH. Increased risk of mortality and readmission among patients discharged against medical advice. Am J Med. 2012;125(6):594-602.

2. Glasgow JM, Vaughn-Sarrazin M, Kaboli PJ. Leaving against medical advice (AMA): risk of 30-day mortality and hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(9):926-929.

3. Hwang SW, Li J, Gupta R, et al. What happens to patients who leave hospital against medical advice? CMAJ. 2003;168(4):417-420.

4. Alfandre DJ. "I'm going home": discharges against medical advice. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(3):255-260.

5. Fiscella K, Meldrum S, Barnett S. Hospital discharge against advice after myocardial infarction: deaths and readmissions. Am J Med. 2007;120(12):1047-1053.

6. Ibrahim SA, Kwoh CK, Krishnan E. Factors associated with patients who leave acute-care hospitals against medical advice. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(12):2204-2208.

7. Choi M, Kim H, Qian H, Palepu A. Readmission rates of patients discharged against medical advice: a matched cohort study. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24459.

8. Ti L, Ti L. Leaving the hospital against medical advice among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(12):e53-e59.

9. Chan AC, Palepu A, Guh DP, et al. HIV-positive injection drug users who leave the hospital against medical advice: the mitigating role of methadone and social support. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(1):56-59.

10. Onukwugha E, Saunders E, Mullins CD, et al. Reasons for discharges against medical advice: a qualitative study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):e7.

11. Weingart S, Gandhi TK, Seger AC, et al. Patient-reported medication symptoms in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(2):234-240.

12. Anis AH, Sun H, Guh DP, et al. Leaving hospital against medical advice among HIV-positive patients. CMAJ. 2002;167(6):633-637.

13. Pages KP, Russo JE, Wingerson DK, et al. Predictors and outcome of discharge against medical advice from the psychiatric units of a general hospital. Psychiatr Serv. 1998;49(9):1187-1192.

14. Baptist AP, Warrier I, Arora R, et al. Hospitalized patients with asthma who leave against medical advice: characteristics, reasons, and outcomes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119(4):924-929.

15. Franks P, Meldrum S, Fiscella K. Discharges against medical advice: are race/ethnicity predictors? J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(9):955-960.

16. Southern WN, Nahvi S, Arnsten JH. Increased risk of mortality and readmission among patients discharged against medical advice. Am J Med. 2012;125(6):594-602.

17. Spooner KK, Salemi JL, Salihu HM, Zoorob RJ. Discharge against medical advice in the United States, 2002-2011. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(4):525-535.

18. Green P, Watts D, Poole S, Dhopesh V. Why patients sign out against medical advice (AMA): factors motivating patients to sign out AMA. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2004;30(2):489-493.

19. Southern WN, Nahvi S, Arnsten JH. Increased risk of mortality and readmission among patients discharged against medical advice. Am J Med. 2012;125(6):594-602.

20. Fiscella K, Meldrum S, Barnett S. Hospital discharge against advice after myocardial infarction: deaths and readmissions. Am J Med. 2007;120(12):1047-1053.

21. Garland A, Ramsey CD, Fransoo R, et al. Rates of readmission and death associated with leaving hospital against medical advice: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2013;185(14):1207-1214.

22. Shirani F, Jalili M, Asl-e-Soleimani H. Discharge against medical advice from emergency department: results from a tertiary hospital in Tehran, Iran. Eur J Emerg Med. 2010;17(6):318-321.

23. Hwang SW, Li J, Gupta R, et al. What happens to patients who leave hospital against medical advice? CMAJ. 2003;168(4):417-420.

24. Alfandre D. Reconsidering against medical advice discharges: embracing patient-centeredness to promote high quality care and a renewed research agenda. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(12):1657-1662.

25. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019.

26. Appelbaum PS. Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1834-1840.

27. Devitt PJ, Devitt AC, Dewan M. Does identifying a discharge as "against medical advice" confer legal protection? J Fam Pract. 2000;49(3):224-227.

28. Ratanawongsa N, Federowicz MA, Christmas C, et al. Effects of a focused patient-centered care curriculum on the experiences of internal medicine residents and their patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(4):473-477.

29. Alfandre DJ. Improving quality and safety through informed consent for patients leaving against medical advice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(11):534-539.

30. Simon RI, Shuman DW. Clinical Manual of Psychiatry and Law. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2007.

31. Berger JT. Discharge against medical advice: ethical considerations and professional obligations. J Hosp Med. 2008;3(5):403-408.

32. Yong TY, Fok JS, Hakendorf P, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of discharges against medical advice among hospitalized patients. Intern Med J. 2013;43(7):798-802.

33. Levy F, Mareiniss DP, Iacovelli C. The importance of a proper against-medical-advice (AMA) discharge: how signing out AMA may create significant liability protection for providers. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(3):516-520.

34. Englander H, Dobbertin K, Lind BK, et al. Inpatient addiction medicine consultation and post-hospital substance use disorder treatment engagement: a propensity-matched analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(12):2796-2803.

35. Priest KC, Lovejoy TI, Englander H, et al. Opioid agonist therapy during hospitalization within the Veterans Health Administration: a pragmatic retrospective cohort analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(8):2365-2374.

36. Alfandre D. Improving quality and safety through informed consent for patients leaving against medical advice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(11):534-539.