The Reflexed Dexamethasone Suppression Test
The Reflexed Dexamethasone Suppression Test in Cushing's Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review for the Modern Clinician
Abstract
The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome remains one of the most challenging endocrine investigations in clinical medicine. The reflexed dexamethasone suppression test represents an evolution in diagnostic strategy, combining screening and confirmatory testing in a streamlined approach. This review examines the physiologic basis, methodologic considerations, interpretation pitfalls, and clinical pearls for internists navigating the complex diagnostic landscape of hypercortisolism.
Introduction
Cushing's syndrome, the clinical state resulting from chronic glucocorticoid excess, affects approximately 2-3 per million people annually, though subclinical disease may be considerably more prevalent. The condition's protean manifestations—ranging from subtle metabolic derangements to florid cushingoid features—demand a systematic diagnostic approach. The reflexed dexamethasone suppression test has emerged as an efficient first-line strategy that reduces diagnostic delay, patient inconvenience, and healthcare costs while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
Physiologic Foundations
Understanding the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is fundamental to interpreting suppression testing. In physiologic states, cortisol secretion follows a circadian rhythm with peak levels at awakening (typically 10-20 μg/dL) and nadir levels near midnight (usually <5 μg/dL). Negative feedback operates at multiple levels: cortisol suppresses both corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) from the hypothalamus and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from the pituitary.
In Cushing's syndrome, this negative feedback mechanism is disrupted. Whether from autonomous adrenal production, ectopic ACTH secretion, or pituitary adenomas with altered glucocorticoid receptor sensitivity, the result is failure of physiologic suppression. Dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid with minimal cross-reactivity in cortisol assays, exploits this principle by providing supraphysiologic negative feedback that should suppress normal but not pathologic cortisol production.
The Reflexed DST Protocol
The reflexed approach combines the overnight 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) with automatic progression to additional testing based on initial results. The standard protocol involves:
- Baseline sampling: Morning (8-9 AM) cortisol and ACTH measurement
- Dexamethasone administration: 1 mg orally at 11 PM
- Post-suppression sampling: Morning cortisol at 8-9 AM (16-17 hours post-dose)
- Reflexed testing: If cortisol >1.8 μg/dL, automatic progression to confirmatory tests
The critical advantage lies in workflow efficiency. Rather than requiring patients to return for sequential testing over weeks, the reflexed approach enables comprehensive evaluation from a single visit, with the laboratory automatically performing additional assays based on predetermined algorithms.
Interpretation: Beyond the Numbers
Pearl 1: The Threshold Controversy
Traditional teaching cited a post-DST cortisol cutoff of 5 μg/dL, but contemporary evidence supports lower thresholds. Studies by Nieman and colleagues demonstrated that using 1.8 μg/dL as the cutoff improves sensitivity from 95% to 98% while maintaining specificity above 90%. However, the 1.8 μg/dL threshold generates more false positives in certain populations.
Clinical Hack: Use context-dependent cutoffs. For screening in populations with high pretest probability (e.g., adrenal incidentalomas, resistant hypertension), the 1.8 μg/dL threshold is appropriate. In unselected populations or those with multiple false-positive risk factors, consider 2.5-3.0 μg/dL to optimize specificity.
Pearl 2: The Estrogen Effect
Estrogen increases cortisol-binding globulin (CBG), elevating total cortisol measurements without affecting free (biologically active) cortisol. Women taking oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy commonly have false-positive DST results.
Oyster: A 35-year-old woman on oral contraceptives presents with weight gain and fatigue. Her post-DST cortisol is 3.2 μg/dL. Before pursuing expensive imaging, measure free cortisol (via salivary cortisol or calculated free cortisol index). Alternatively, discontinue estrogen for 6 weeks and repeat testing. This simple step prevents unnecessary evaluation in up to 20% of premenopausal women.
Pearl 3: Pseudo-Cushing's States
Depression, alcoholism, and obesity can produce hypercortisolism clinically and biochemically indistinguishable from true Cushing's syndrome. These conditions cause CRH-driven cortisol elevation that may not suppress normally with low-dose dexamethasone.
Clinical Hack: The CRH stimulation test or the dexamethasone-CRH test can help differentiate pseudo-Cushing's from true disease. In pseudo-Cushing's, cortisol post-CRH stimulation typically remains <1.4 times baseline, whereas Cushing's patients show exaggerated responses. However, the desmopressin stimulation test is increasingly used as a more practical alternative with comparable accuracy.
Technical Considerations and Common Pitfalls
Medication Interactions
Drugs affecting cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme activity alter dexamethasone metabolism, producing spurious results. CYP3A4 inducers (phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampin, carbamazepine, pioglitazone) accelerate dexamethasone clearance, causing false-positive results. Conversely, CYP3A4 inhibitors (ritonavir, itraconazole, aprepitant, diltiazem) slow clearance, potentially causing false-negative results.
Pearl 4: Always obtain a complete medication history before DST. If the patient takes CYP3A4-affecting medications that cannot be discontinued, proceed directly to 24-hour urinary free cortisol (UFC) or late-night salivary cortisol testing instead.
Assay Considerations
Modern cortisol assays use either immunoassay or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Immunoassays may cross-react with synthetic glucocorticoids, prednisolone, and other steroids, producing falsely elevated results. This is particularly problematic in patients using topical, inhaled, or nasal corticosteroids.
Oyster: A patient with COPD on fluticasone inhaler has a post-DST cortisol of 4.5 μg/dL. Despite apparent non-suppression, the patient exhibits no cushingoid features. The issue: immunoassay cross-reactivity with fluticasone metabolites. Request LC-MS/MS measurement, which will likely show appropriate suppression.
Patient Compliance and Timing
Failure to take dexamethasone or incorrect timing compromises test validity. The 11 PM dosing time is critical for proper interpretation using morning cortisol thresholds.
Clinical Hack: Provide patients with a smartphone alarm reminder and have them text a photo of the empty pill cup as documentation. For patients with cognitive impairment or poor health literacy, consider observed administration in a supervised setting or alternative testing strategies.
Integration with Confirmatory Testing
When the reflexed DST suggests Cushing's syndrome, the diagnosis requires confirmation with at least one additional test—preferably two abnormal results from: 24-hour urinary free cortisol, late-night salivary cortisol, or midnight serum cortisol.
Pearl 5: The Power of Late-Night Salivary Cortisol
Late-night salivary cortisol (collected between 11 PM-midnight) has emerged as the most patient-friendly confirmatory test, with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 92%. The test measures free cortisol and is unaffected by CBG. Collection can be performed at home, improving compliance.
Clinical Hack: For patients with positive DST, send them home with salivary collection kits for two consecutive nights. Two elevated samples (>0.15 μg/dL or laboratory-specific cutoff) strongly confirm Cushing's syndrome and justify proceeding to ACTH measurement and imaging.
Distinguishing Cushing's Syndrome Etiology
Once hypercortisolism is confirmed, determining the cause—pituitary adenoma (Cushing's disease, 70%), ectopic ACTH (10%), or adrenal disease (20%)—guides treatment.
Pearl 6: The ACTH Algorithm
Morning ACTH measurement distinguishes ACTH-dependent from ACTH-independent disease:
- ACTH <5 pg/mL: ACTH-independent (adrenal) Cushing's → proceed to adrenal CT
- ACTH >20 pg/mL: ACTH-dependent → proceed to pituitary MRI and consider high-dose DST or CRH stimulation
- ACTH 5-20 pg/mL: Indeterminate → repeat or pursue additional testing
Oyster: A patient with confirmed Cushing's has ACTH of 18 pg/mL. Pituitary MRI shows a 3-mm lesion. Is this the cause? Remember: 10% of the population has incidental pituitary microadenomas. The finding doesn't confirm Cushing's disease. Proceed to inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) if surgical intervention is planned, as this remains the gold standard for localizing ACTH source with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 95%.
Special Populations
Cyclic Cushing's Syndrome
Approximately 15% of Cushing's syndrome patients have cyclic hypercortisolism with periods of normal cortisol production. These patients pose diagnostic challenges, as testing during quiescent phases yields normal results.
Clinical Hack: For patients with high clinical suspicion but negative initial testing, collect multiple late-night salivary cortisol samples over 2-4 weeks. This captures episodic hypercortisolism more reliably than repeated DST. Additionally, ask patients to monitor symptoms and correlate symptom exacerbations with collection times.
Subclinical Cushing's Syndrome
Patients with adrenal incidentalomas may have autonomous cortisol secretion without obvious cushingoid features. Studies suggest 5-30% of adrenal incidentalomas demonstrate abnormal DST, associated with increased cardiovascular risk, diabetes, and osteoporosis.
Pearl 7: In patients with adrenal incidentalomas, use post-DST cortisol >1.8 μg/dL as a screening threshold, but consider the entire clinical picture. Cortisol levels of 1.8-5.0 μg/dL without clinical features represent "possible autonomous cortisol secretion" and warrant monitoring or assessment for cortisol-associated comorbidities rather than immediate adrenalectomy.
Cost-Effectiveness and Healthcare Delivery
The reflexed DST approach reduces healthcare costs by consolidating testing. Traditional sequential testing requires multiple office visits, repeated phlebotomy, and delayed diagnosis. Studies demonstrate that reflexed testing reduces time to diagnosis by 40% and healthcare costs by 25-35% while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
Clinical Hack: When ordering DST, communicate with your laboratory to establish reflexed testing protocols. Many laboratories will automatically measure ACTH from the same sample if post-DST cortisol exceeds the threshold, eliminating an additional venipuncture and enabling same-day etiologic evaluation.
Future Directions
Emerging technologies promise to refine Cushing's diagnosis further. Hair cortisol analysis provides integrated cortisol exposure over months, potentially detecting cyclic disease more reliably. Artificial intelligence algorithms analyzing multiple biochemical parameters may improve diagnostic accuracy. Genetic testing for familial syndromes (MEN1, Carney complex) becomes relevant in young patients or those with family histories.
Practical Approach: A Diagnostic Algorithm
For the busy internist, consider this streamlined approach:
- Clinical suspicion: Presence of discriminatory features (proximal myopathy, wide purple striae, facial plethora) or multiple suggestive features in appropriate clinical context
- Initial screening: Reflexed 1-mg overnight DST with predetermined ACTH measurement if cortisol >1.8 μg/dL
- Confirmation: Two late-night salivary cortisol measurements (collected at home)
- Localization: If ACTH-independent, obtain adrenal CT; if ACTH-dependent, obtain pituitary MRI with consideration for IPSS if surgery contemplated
- Subspecialty referral: Engage endocrinology early, particularly for ACTH-dependent disease or when diagnostic uncertainty persists
Conclusion
The reflexed dexamethasone suppression test represents an elegant synthesis of physiology, efficiency, and patient-centeredness in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Success requires understanding not just the test mechanics but the numerous variables affecting interpretation—from medication interactions to assay limitations to population-specific considerations. The pearls and practical approaches outlined here should empower internists to navigate this diagnostic challenge with greater confidence and efficiency, ultimately improving outcomes for patients with this morbid yet eminently treatable condition.
The modern approach to Cushing's diagnosis emphasizes integration of clinical acumen with biochemical testing, mindful of both sensitivity and specificity. By understanding the nuances presented in this review, clinicians can avoid common pitfalls, optimize resource utilization, and most importantly, identify patients who will benefit from definitive treatment of their hypercortisolism.
References
-
Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, et al. The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1526-1540.
-
Raff H, Findling JW. A physiologic approach to diagnosis of the Cushing syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(12):980-991.
-
Elamin MB, Murad MH, Mullan R, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic tests for Cushing's syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalyses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1553-1562.
-
Petersenn S, Beckers A, Ferone D, et al. Therapy of endocrine disease: outcomes in patients with Cushing's disease undergoing transsphenoidal surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172(1):R1-R19.
-
Fassnacht M, Arlt W, Bancos I, et al. Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;175(2):G1-G34.
-
Yanovski JA, Cutler GB Jr, Chrousos GP, Nieman LK. Corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation following low-dose dexamethasone administration. JAMA. 1993;269(17):2232-2238.
-
Findling JW, Raff H, Aron DC. The low-dose dexamethasone suppression test: a reevaluation in patients with Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(3):1222-1226.
-
Ceccato F, Barbot M, Scaroni C, Boscaro M. Frequently asked questions and answers (if any) in patients with adrenal incidentaloma. J Endocrinol Invest. 2021;44(11):2749-2763.
Comments
Post a Comment