The Consultant's Playbook: How to Give Advice That Is Actually Followed

Elevating the Skill of Consulting from Giving an Answer to Influencing Care

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Medical consultation is a fundamental component of modern healthcare delivery, yet the effectiveness of consultant recommendations varies considerably. Studies suggest that up to 50% of consultant recommendations are either partially implemented or ignored entirely. This review provides evidence-based strategies and practical frameworks to enhance the impact and implementation of consultant recommendations. We examine communication techniques, documentation strategies, interprofessional dynamics, and ethical considerations that transform consultation from a transactional exchange to an influential partnership in patient care.

Introduction

The art of consultation extends far beyond clinical expertise. A consultant who provides accurate diagnoses but whose recommendations go unheeded has failed in their fundamental mission. The modern consultant must master not only the science of their specialty but also the psychology of influence, the sociology of healthcare teams, and the pragmatics of communication.

Research in implementation science demonstrates that knowledge alone does not change behavior. The consultant's challenge is to bridge the "know-do gap"—the chasm between what should be done and what actually gets done. This requires understanding cognitive load theory, decision fatigue, competing priorities, and the complex interpersonal dynamics of healthcare teams.

The "Three-Sentence" Consult Note: How to Write Recommendations That Are Un-ignorable

The Problem with Traditional Consult Notes

Traditional consultation notes often bury critical recommendations in lengthy prose, obscuring actionable items amid differential diagnoses, comprehensive reviews of systems, and extensive documentation. A study by Kessels found that patients immediately forget 40-80% of medical information provided during consultations, and similar principles apply to physician-to-physician communication.

The Three-Sentence Framework

The "Three-Sentence Rule" provides a cognitive forcing function that distills recommendations to their essence:

Sentence 1: The Bottom Line State your primary recommendation in plain language without qualification. Example: "Recommend stopping vancomycin and starting linezolid for MRSA bacteremia with persistent fevers."

Sentence 2: The Why Provide the single most compelling reason. Example: "Vancomycin trough of 8 mcg/mL suggests inadequate penetration despite dose escalation, and MIC is 2 mcg/mL (borderline susceptible)."

Sentence 3: The What's Next Specify the immediate action and timeline. Example: "Start linezolid 600 mg IV q12h today; will follow cultures and reassess in 48 hours."

Pearl: The Inverted Pyramid Structure

Borrow from journalism: lead with conclusions, not build-up. Busy clinicians scan notes from top to bottom; if they stop reading after three lines, they should still capture your essential message.

Oyster: When Complexity Demands More

Some consultations require nuanced discussion. In these cases, use the "Executive Summary + Deep Dive" model:

Place the three-sentence summary at the top in bold or under a clear header like "KEY RECOMMENDATIONS"
Follow with detailed assessment and reasoning for those who need it
Number all recommendations explicitly (1, 2, 3...) rather than embedding them in paragraphs

The Power of Numbering

Numbering recommendations serves multiple cognitive functions:

Creates discrete, trackable action items
Facilitates read-back and handoff communication
Allows team members to reference specific recommendations ("Let's discuss recommendation #2")
Psychologically signals completeness and organization

A study published in the Journal of Hospital Medicine demonstrated that structured consultant recommendations with numbered lists had 73% implementation rates compared to 41% for narrative-only consultations.

Managing Up and Across: How to Advise Senior Attendings from Other Services

Understanding the Psychological Landscape

Advising senior colleagues, particularly those from other specialties, requires navigating complex interpersonal dynamics including:

Status anxiety: The requesting physician may perceive consultation as implicit criticism
Autonomy threat: Recommendations may be seen as encroaching on decision-making authority
Cognitive dissonance: Your advice may contradict their existing management plan
Specialty silos: Different training cultures create divergent mental models

The Collaborative Language Framework

Replace directive language with collaborative framing:

Instead of: "Stop the fluoroquinolone immediately." Try: "I'm concerned about QT prolongation given the concurrent azithromycin. Would you consider alternatives like doxycycline?"

Instead of: "The patient needs urgent dialysis." Try: "Based on the refractory hyperkalemia and pH of 7.18, I think dialysis would be beneficial. I'm happy to arrange it urgently if you agree."

Hack: The "What Would You Think About..." Technique

This phrase is extraordinarily effective because it:

Frames recommendations as collaborative exploration
Preserves the requesting physician's autonomy
Invites dialogue rather than imposing edicts
Reduces defensive reactions

Example: "What would you think about adding stress-dose steroids given the refractory shock and chronic prednisone use?"

The Pre-consultation Phone Call

For complex or potentially contentious recommendations, consider a brief phone conversation before writing the note. This:

Establishes rapport and shared mental models
Allows real-time clarification and negotiation
Reduces misunderstanding and implementation failures
Demonstrates respect for the primary team's expertise

Pearl: The Attribution Technique

When making recommendations that align with existing plans, explicitly credit the primary team: "The primary team has appropriately initiated broad-spectrum antibiotics; we agree with this approach and recommend continuing pending culture data."

This builds alliance, acknowledges their expertise, and increases receptivity to subsequent recommendations that may diverge from their plan.

When Disagreement is Fundamental

Occasionally, patient safety requires firm recommendations despite potential conflict. In these situations:

Document clearly and explicitly: "Strongly recommend discontinuing amiodarone today given QTc of 580 ms and risk of torsades de pointes"
Escalate through appropriate channels if recommendations are not followed
Consider direct communication with the attending of record
Document conversations and clinical reasoning meticulously

The Follow-Up Strategy: How to Ensure Your Plan is Executed Without Being a Nuisance

The Implementation Gap

Studies show that 30-50% of consultant recommendations are only partially implemented or modified without discussion. The consultant's responsibility extends beyond writing recommendations to ensuring their execution and adapting to evolving clinical situations.

The Tiered Follow-Up Model

Tier 1: Built-In Follow-Up (Essential) Always include explicit follow-up plans in your initial consultation:

"Will follow cultures and adjust antibiotics accordingly"
"Will recheck labs in AM and adjust insulin regimen"
"Will reassess hemodynamics after 30 mg IV furosemide bolus"

This signals ongoing involvement and creates expectation of continued partnership.

Tier 2: Strategic Check-Ins (High-Stakes Cases) For critical recommendations or unstable patients:

Return within 24 hours even if not formally requested
Call the primary team directly: "Just checking in on Mr. Johnson—did the diuresis achieve our UOP goal?"
Review interim data proactively

Tier 3: Sign-Off Consultations (Stable, Resolved Issues) For limited consultations where ongoing involvement isn't needed:

State explicitly: "No further rheumatology follow-up needed as an inpatient; recommend outpatient follow-up in 4-6 weeks"
Provide clear "call-back" triggers: "Please re-consult if fever recurs or WBC rises"

Oyster: The "Soft Surveillance" Technique

For recommendations you're concerned may not be followed, implement soft surveillance:

Review the chart daily without writing addenda (unless clinically indicated)
Monitor for your specific recommendations in orders and nursing documentation
If not implemented after 24-48 hours, reach out: "I noticed the lisinopril wasn't started yet—is there a reason, or would you like me to place the order?"

This approach balances diligence with respect for the primary team's autonomy and workflow.

Pearl: The "I'll Put in the Order" Offer

For time-sensitive or easily overlooked recommendations: "I'm happy to place the pantoprazole order myself if that's helpful." This:

Reduces primary team workload
Ensures accurate dosing and timing
Demonstrates collaborative spirit
Dramatically increases implementation

Documentation of Follow-Up

When you return to follow up, structure your note efficiently:

"Cardiology follow-up"
Brief assessment of interval change
Updated recommendations (numbered)
Clear disposition (continuing to follow vs. signing off)

Avoid redundant re-documentation of stable history and physical findings.

Handling the Curbside: The Legal, Ethical, and Practical Framework for Informal Advice

The Curbside Consultation Landscape

Curbside consultations—informal, often verbal exchanges of clinical advice—are ubiquitous in hospital medicine. Studies estimate that 50-70% of specialist input occurs through curbside consultations rather than formal consults. While efficient, they carry significant medicolegal and ethical risks.

The Legal Framework

Key Medicolegal Principles:

No physician-patient relationship: Courts have generally held that curbside consultations do not establish a formal duty of care, but this varies by jurisdiction
Liability of the requesting physician: The physician seeking advice typically bears primary responsibility for patient care
The consultant's duty: Even in informal consultations, consultants must provide advice consistent with the standard of care and may be held liable for grossly negligent advice

Risk Mitigation Strategies:

Document curbside consultations in your own records (even if not in patient chart)
Clarify limitations: "Based on the limited information you've provided..."
Recommend formal consultation for complex cases
Never prescribe medications or order tests via curbside

Hack: The Curbside Script

Standardize your curbside approach:

"Happy to help. A few things: First, I haven't seen the patient or reviewed the chart, so this is general guidance only. Second, if this is complex or high-risk, a formal consult would be better. Third, I'm going to document this conversation in my records. With those caveats, here's my thought..."

This script:

Sets appropriate expectations
Defines boundaries
Establishes documentation trail
Protects both parties

When to Insist on Formal Consultation

Convert curbside to formal consultation when:

Patient is clinically unstable or high-risk
Diagnostic workup will be extensive
Your recommendations are time-sensitive or high-stakes
You need to review primary data (imaging, pathology, etc.)
The question is outside your core expertise
Medicolegal risk is significant

Phrase this diplomatically: "This sounds complex enough that I'd like to see the patient formally. Can you put in a consult? I'll see them this afternoon."

Pearl: The Curbside Follow-Up

After providing curbside advice, follow up: "Just wanted to check in on that patient we discussed yesterday. How did things evolve?" This:

Demonstrates genuine interest
Allows you to correct course if needed
Builds collaborative relationships
Provides learning opportunities

Ethical Considerations

Curbside consultations raise ethical questions about:

Resource allocation: Are curbsides a form of "queue jumping" that disadvantages other patients?
Quality of care: Does informal advice compromise thoroughness?
Informed consent: Is the patient aware a specialist has weighed in without seeing them?

Best practice: Use curbside consultations for straightforward questions, simple medication adjustments, or preliminary guidance while formal consultation is pending. Complex decision-making deserves formal evaluation.

The Graceful "I Don't Know": Maintaining Authority While Acknowledging Limits

The Paradox of Expertise

The Dunning-Kruger effect demonstrates that the most competent individuals are often most aware of the limits of their knowledge. True expertise includes knowing the boundaries of one's competence. Yet medical culture often stigmatizes uncertainty, creating pressure to project omniscience.

Why "I Don't Know" Strengthens Credibility

Research in social psychology demonstrates that acknowledging uncertainty when appropriate:

Increases trust and perceived honesty
Enhances perceived expertise (the "honesty premium")
Models intellectual humility for trainees
Reduces likelihood of anchoring on incorrect diagnoses

A study in JAMA Internal Medicine found that physicians who explicitly acknowledged uncertainty in ambiguous cases were rated as more trustworthy and competent by both patients and colleagues.

The Graduated Uncertainty Response

Match your response to the situation:

Level 1: Known Unknowns (You know where to find the answer) "I'm not certain about the dosing of that medication in ESKD, but I'll look it up and get back to you within the hour."

Level 2: Expertise Gap (Outside your scope) "This is at the edge of my expertise. I'd recommend consulting hematology for this specific clotting disorder."

Level 3: Evidence Gap (Medicine doesn't know) "There's no high-quality data on this specific scenario. Here's how I would approach it based on first principles and extrapolation from related conditions, but I want to be transparent that we're in uncertain territory."

Level 4: Diagnostic Uncertainty (The honest differential) "I'm considering three possibilities here with fairly similar probabilities. Rather than anchoring prematurely, I'd recommend we pursue diagnostic testing that would help differentiate..."

Hack: The "Let Me Think About This" Technique

When faced with a complex question without an immediate answer: "This is a really interesting case. Let me think about this carefully and review the literature. I'll get back to you by [specific time] with a thoughtful recommendation."

This approach:

Buys time for deliberation
Signals conscientiousness
Prevents premature cognitive closure
Allows consultation with colleagues

Maintaining Authority Through Uncertainty

The key is to couple uncertainty with a clear action plan:

Weak: "I don't know what's causing this rash."

Strong: "I'm not certain of the diagnosis. The differential includes drug reaction, viral exanthem, and early vasculitis. Here's my diagnostic approach: I'll review medication timing, check viral serologies, consider skin biopsy if it doesn't resolve in 48 hours, and consult dermatology if needed. Let's reassess tomorrow morning."

Pearl: The Specialist Network

Cultivate relationships with sub-specialists and regional experts for "consultant's consultants" scenarios. Phrases like "I discussed this case with Dr. Smith, our institution's expert in X" powerfully demonstrates thoroughness and humility.

Teaching Uncertainty

For medical educators, explicitly modeling comfort with uncertainty is crucial:

Share your reasoning process, including doubts
Demonstrate literature searching in real-time
Discuss cases where you were initially wrong
Celebrate learners who appropriately acknowledge limitations

This creates a culture where intellectual honesty is valued over false confidence.

Conclusion: The Consultant as Partner

Effective consultation transcends the diagnostic question-and-answer model. The influential consultant functions as a collaborative partner—anticipating implementation barriers, adapting communication to audience, following through on recommendations, and modeling intellectual integrity.

The skills outlined in this playbook—concise documentation, diplomatic communication, strategic follow-up, bounded informal advice, and graceful uncertainty—transform consultation from a transactional service to an integrated partnership in patient care.

As healthcare becomes increasingly complex and specialized, the consultant's ability to influence care will determine not just individual patient outcomes but the effectiveness of the entire healthcare team. Mastering these skills is not peripheral to clinical expertise—it is essential to it.

Key Takeaways

Write for scanners, not readers: Lead with conclusions in three sentences or less
Frame collaboratively: Use "What would you think about..." instead of directives
Follow up strategically: Don't disappear after writing recommendations
Boundary curbsides carefully: Document, clarify limits, and escalate when appropriate
Embrace calibrated uncertainty: "I don't know" with a plan is stronger than false confidence

References

Kessels RP. Patients' memory for medical information. J R Soc Med. 2003;96(5):219-222.
Goldman L, Lee T, Rudd P. Ten commandments for effective consultations. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143(9):1753-1755.
Lee TH, Pappius EM, Goldman L. Impact of inter-physician communication on the effectiveness of medical consultations. Am J Med. 1983;74(1):106-112.
Horwitz LI, Jenq GY, Brewster UC, et al. Comprehensive quality of discharge summaries at an academic medical center. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(8):436-443.
Salerno SM, Hurst FP, Halvorson S, Mercado DL. Principles of effective consultation: an update for the 21st-century consultant. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(3):271-275.
Kuo YF, Sharma G, Freeman JL, Goodwin JS. Growth in the care of older patients by hospitalists in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(11):1102-1112.
Patel MS, Arron MJ, Sinsky TA, et al. Estimating the staffing infrastructure for a patient-centered medical home. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(6):509-516.
Sears CL. Curbside consultations in infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(8):1010-1013.
Frankel RM, Stein T. Getting the most out of the clinical encounter: the four habits model. J Med Pract Manage. 2001;16(4):184-191.
Berwick DM, Finkelstein JA. Preparing medical students for the continual improvement of health and health care: Abraham Flexner and the new "public interest." Acad Med. 2010;85(9 Suppl):S56-S65.
Simpkin AL, Schwartzstein RM. Tolerating uncertainty—the next medical revolution? N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1713-1715.
Bhise V, Rajan SS, Sittig DF, Morgan RO, Chaudhary P, Singh H. Defining and measuring diagnostic uncertainty in medicine: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(1):103-115.
Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(6):1121-1134.
Kahn MW. Etiquette-based medicine. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):1988-1989.
Wiese J, Varosy P, Tierney L. Improving oral presentation skills with a clinical reasoning curriculum: a prospective controlled study. Am J Med. 2002;112(3):212-218.