Choosing the Correct Radiographic View in Chest Imaging

 

Choosing the Correct Radiographic View in Chest Imaging: A Practical Guide for the Internist

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Chest radiography remains the most frequently performed imaging investigation in clinical medicine, yet the selection of appropriate radiographic views is often overlooked in medical education and practice. This review provides a comprehensive, evidence-based approach to selecting optimal chest radiographic views for various clinical scenarios encountered in internal medicine. We discuss the technical principles, clinical applications, indications, and limitations of standard and specialized chest radiographic projections, supplemented with practical pearls for enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Introduction

Despite the proliferation of advanced imaging modalities, chest radiography maintains its position as the cornerstone of thoracic imaging, with over 100 million examinations performed annually in the United States alone.¹ The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria emphasize that proper view selection is crucial for diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose optimization.² However, studies suggest that inappropriate view selection contributes to up to 30% of non-diagnostic chest radiographs, leading to repeated examinations, delayed diagnoses, and increased healthcare costs.³

This review synthesizes current evidence and expert consensus to guide internists in selecting appropriate chest radiographic views, emphasizing practical applications in common clinical scenarios.

Standard Radiographic Views

Posteroanterior (PA) View

The PA projection, performed with the patient upright and the X-ray beam traversing from posterior to anterior, represents the gold standard for routine chest imaging.⁴ The patient's anterior chest wall contacts the image receptor, with shoulders rotated forward to displace the scapulae laterally.

Technical Advantages:

• Minimizes cardiac magnification (heart-to-film distance approximately 180 cm)
• Provides reproducible cardiac silhouette measurements
• Optimal visualization of pulmonary vasculature and interstitial detail
• Superior assessment of lung volumes

Clinical Pearl: A properly positioned PA radiograph should demonstrate medial borders of the scapulae projected lateral to the lung fields, and the spinous processes equidistant from the medial clavicular ends, indicating absence of rotation.⁵

Oyster: The PA view may underestimate cardiac size in patients with pectus excavatum due to apparent narrowing of the cardiac silhouette. Consider lateral or cross-sectional imaging in such cases.⁶

Anteroposterior (AP) View

The AP projection, with the X-ray beam directed from anterior to posterior, is primarily utilized when PA positioning is impractical—typically in portable radiography, critically ill patients, or those unable to stand.

Key Limitations:

• Cardiac magnification of 15-20% due to increased heart-to-film distance⁷
• Inability to displace scapulae laterally, obscuring upper lung zones
• Frequent lordotic positioning causing cephalad displacement of structures
• Reduced inspiratory capacity in supine positioning

Clinical Hack: When comparing serial AP radiographs with a baseline PA study, document "apparent cardiomegaly may be positional" to prevent misinterpretation. Use the cardiothoracic ratio with caution in AP films.⁸

Pearl: In AP supine radiographs, pulmonary vascular redistribution appears more prominent due to hydrostatic effects. Compare with previous upright films before diagnosing acute heart failure.⁹

Lateral View

The lateral projection, typically left lateral (left chest against the receptor), complements the PA view by providing orthogonal information crucial for three-dimensional localization of abnormalities.

Essential Applications:

• Localization of nodules and masses (anterior vs. posterior mediastinum)
• Assessment of retrocardiac and retrodiaphragmatic regions
• Evaluation of thoracic spine and sternum
• Detection of pleural effusions (posterior costophrenic sulcus assessment)

Oyster: Small pleural effusions (50-100 mL) may be visible on lateral view before becoming apparent on PA radiograph, as fluid accumulates in the posterior costophrenic sulcus in upright patients.¹⁰

Clinical Decision Rule: Order a lateral view when:

1. Initial chest radiograph demonstrates an abnormality requiring localization
2. Clinical suspicion exists despite normal PA radiograph
3. Evaluating known anterior mediastinal masses or retrocardiac pathology
4. Following up pulmonary nodules or masses

Specialized Views

Lateral Decubitus View

Performed with the patient in lateral recumbent position (affected side down for effusions), this view exploits gravitational layering of free pleural fluid.

Primary Indications:

• Differentiation of free versus loculated pleural effusions¹¹
• Detection of small effusions (as little as 5-10 mL)
• Distinguishing pleural fluid from parenchymal consolidation
• Assessment of pneumothorax (affected side up)

Technical Pearl: A minimum of 5-10 minutes in lateral position before exposure allows optimal fluid redistribution. Request "please maintain position for 10 minutes" on the requisition.¹²

Hack: When suspecting bilateral effusions masked by supine positioning, order bilateral decubitus views rather than CT, especially in resource-limited settings or when radiation minimization is paramount.

Apical Lordotic View

This projection, obtained with the patient leaning backward approximately 15-20 degrees or with cephalad angulation of the X-ray beam, projects the clavicles superior to the lung apices.

Specific Indications:

• Evaluation of apical lung lesions (tuberculosis, Pancoast tumor)
• Assessment of middle lobe or lingular pathology
• Visualization of subtle pneumothorax apices¹³

Oyster: This view has largely been supplanted by CT in modern practice. Reserve for cases where CT is contraindicated or unavailable, as interpretation requires specific expertise and normal anatomical variations can mimic pathology.¹⁴

Expiratory View

Obtained at end-expiration (typically paired with standard inspiratory film), expiratory views enhance detection of air trapping and small pneumothoraces.

Key Indications:

• Suspected pneumothorax with equivocal inspiratory film¹⁵
• Detection of air trapping in small airways disease
• Foreign body aspiration in appropriate clinical context
• Evaluation of diaphragmatic mobility (fluoroscopy preferred)

Pearl: In expiratory films, a pneumothorax appears relatively larger as the lung volume decreases while the pleural air volume remains constant, increasing conspicuity.¹⁶

Clinical Hack: In suspected tension pneumothorax, do NOT delay intervention for expiratory views. Clinical diagnosis supersedes radiographic confirmation in hemodynamically unstable patients.

Oblique Views

Anterior oblique (RAO, LAO) and posterior oblique (RPO, LPO) projections provide additional perspectives, though rarely used in modern practice.

Limited Current Applications:

• Rib fracture evaluation (now largely replaced by CT)
• Assessment of cardiac chambers in selected cases
• Evaluation of hilar structures when PA/lateral are inconclusive

Practice Pearl: With widespread CT availability, oblique chest radiographs have minimal role in contemporary internal medicine practice. Consider CT directly if PA and lateral views are non-diagnostic.¹⁷

Clinical Scenarios and View Selection

Scenario 1: Suspected Pneumonia

Recommended Protocol: PA and lateral views (if ambulatory); single AP if bedbound

Rationale: Lateral view increases sensitivity for retrocardiac lower lobe and lingular pneumonias by 15-20%.¹⁸ However, in obviously abnormal PA films with classic clinical presentation, lateral view may be deferred to reduce radiation and cost.

Pearl: Consider lateral decubitus if distinguishing parapneumonic effusion from consolidation is clinically important for management decisions (thoracentesis consideration).

Scenario 2: Heart Failure Evaluation

Recommended Protocol: PA and lateral (baseline); AP portable for serial monitoring in ICU

Rationale: PA view essential for accurate cardiomegaly assessment. Lateral view helps identify pleural effusions and assess for retrocardiac atelectasis.¹⁹

Hack: In chronic heart failure patients, avoid ordering daily portable radiographs unless clinical change occurs. Studies show no mortality benefit from daily routine films in stable ICU patients.²⁰

Scenario 3: Suspected Pneumothorax

Recommended Protocol: Upright PA view (first-line); expiratory view if PA equivocal; lateral decubitus (affected side up) if patient cannot sit upright

Rationale: Upright PA identifies pneumothoraces as small as 50 mL. Expiratory views increase sensitivity marginally but are often unnecessary if clinical suspicion is high enough to warrant CT.²¹

Critical Pearl: The "deep sulcus sign" on supine AP radiographs indicates pneumothorax in recumbent patients—look for lucency extending into costophrenic angle and along cardiac border.²²

Scenario 4: Pleural Effusion

Recommended Protocol: PA and lateral for detection; lateral decubitus (affected side down) to confirm free-flowing nature

Rationale: PA view detects effusions >175-200 mL; lateral view >50-100 mL; decubitus view >5-10 mL.¹⁰

Oyster: In supine AP radiographs, moderate effusions may manifest only as diffuse haziness over the hemithorax rather than classic meniscus, leading to underdiagnosis.

Scenario 5: Solitary Pulmonary Nodule

Recommended Protocol: PA and lateral for localization; prior films crucial for stability assessment

Rationale: Lateral view localizes nodules to specific lobes, guiding differential diagnosis and invasive procedures. Two-year stability on comparison films essentially excludes malignancy.²³

Hack: Always request comparison with all available prior studies, not just the most recent. A nodule stable for 2+ years requires no further workup in low-risk patients.

Radiation Considerations

Radiation dose varies significantly by view: PA chest radiograph delivers approximately 0.02 mSv (equivalent to 2-3 days of background radiation), while lateral view adds 0.06-0.08 mSv.²⁴ Although these doses are minimal, ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principles mandate judicious view selection.

Practice Pearl: One CT chest delivers radiation equivalent to approximately 350 PA chest radiographs. When CT is clinically appropriate, don't defer to multiple radiographic views attempting to avoid radiation—proceed directly to definitive imaging.²⁵

Quality Assurance Checklist

Before interpreting any chest radiograph, assess technical adequacy using the RIPE mnemonic:

Rotation: Spinous processes equidistant from medial clavicular ends Inspiration: 8-10 posterior ribs or 5-6 anterior ribs visible above diaphragm Penetration: Vertebral bodies just visible through cardiac silhouette Exposure: Adequate contrast without overexposure or underexposure

Approximately 20-30% of chest radiographs are technically suboptimal, potentially affecting interpretation.²⁶

Future Directions

Artificial intelligence algorithms now demonstrate accuracy comparable to radiologists in detecting pneumothorax, consolidation, and other findings on chest radiographs, potentially augmenting view selection guidance in the future.²⁷ Additionally, ultra-low-dose digital radiography systems continue to reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic quality.

Conclusion

Appropriate chest radiographic view selection represents a fundamental yet often underemphasized skill in internal medicine. The PA and lateral views remain the standard for most clinical indications, while specialized projections serve specific diagnostic purposes. Understanding technical principles, clinical applications, and limitations of each view enables internists to optimize diagnostic accuracy, minimize radiation exposure, and reduce healthcare costs. As imaging technology evolves, the core principle remains unchanged: select the minimum views necessary to answer the clinical question at hand.

Key Take-Home Points

1. PA and lateral views are indicated for most diagnostic chest imaging
2. AP portable radiographs magnify the heart and should not be used to diagnose cardiomegaly
3. Lateral decubitus views definitively distinguish free from loculated pleural effusions
4. Expiratory views marginally increase pneumothorax detection but rarely change management
5. Always compare with prior studies—stability is the most important characteristic of pulmonary nodules
6. Technical adequacy must be assessed before interpretation (RIPE mnemonic)
7. When PA/lateral views are non-diagnostic, proceed directly to CT rather than ordering multiple specialized radiographic views

---

References

1. Raoof S, Feigin D, Sung A, et al. Interpretation of plain chest roentgenogram. Chest. 2012;141(2):545-558.

2. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Routine Chest Radiography. 2020.

3. Gatt ME, Spectre G, Paltiel O, et al. Chest radiographs in the emergency department: is the radiologist really necessary? Postgrad Med J. 2003;79(930):214-217.

4. Corne J, Pointon K. Chest X-Ray Made Easy. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2015.

5. Goodman LR. Felson's Principles of Chest Roentgenology. 4th ed. Elsevier; 2015.

6. Jaroszewski DE, Fonkalsrud EW. Repair of pectus chest deformities in 320 adult patients: 21 year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(2):429-433.

7. Milne EN, Bass H. The radiologic "cardiac size": A physiological measurement? Radiology. 1969;92(6):1255-1257.

8. Kazerooni EA, Gross BH. Cardiopulmonary imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.

9. Collins J, Stern EJ. Chest Radiology: The Essentials. 3rd ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015.

10. Blackmore CC, Black WC, Dallas RV, Crow HC. Pleural fluid volume estimation: a chest radiograph prediction rule. Acad Radiol. 1996;3(2):103-109.

11. Brixey AG, Luo M, Skouras V, et al. The efficacy of chest radiography in the diagnosis of pleural effusion. Thorax. 2011;66(Suppl 4):A131.

12. Fraser RS, Müller NL, Colman NC, Paré PD. Fraser and Paré's Diagnosis of Diseases of the Chest. 4th ed. WB Saunders; 1999.

13. Tocino IM, Miller MH, Fairfax WR. Distribution of pneumothorax in the supine and semirecumbent critically ill adult. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144(5):901-905.

14. Proto AV, Speckman JM. The left lateral radiograph of the chest. Part I. Med Radiogr Photogr. 1979;55(2):29-74.

15. Bradley M, Williams C, Walshaw MJ. The value of routine expiratory chest films in the diagnosis of pneumothorax. Arch Emerg Med. 1991;8(2):115-116.

16. Seow A, Kazerooni EA, Pernicano PG, Neary M. Comparison of upright inspiratory and expiratory chest radiographs for detecting pneumothoraces. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(2):313-316.

17. Webb WR, Higgins CB. Thoracic Imaging: Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Radiology. 3rd ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2017.

18. Syrjälä H, Broas M, Suramo I, et al. High-resolution computed tomography for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27(2):358-363.

19. Mueller C, McDonald K, de Boer RA, et al. Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology practical guidance on the use of natriuretic peptide concentrations. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(6):715-731.

20. Ganapathy A, Adhikari NK, Spiegelman J, Scales DC. Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2012;16(2):R68.

21. Chan SS. Emergency bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of rib fractures. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27(5):617-620.

22. Kong A. The deep sulcus sign. Radiology. 2003;228(2):415-416.

23. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images. Radiology. 2017;284(1):228-243.

24. Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248(1):254-263.

25. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2078-2086.

26. Grivell AR, Forgie HJ, Fraser CG, Berry MN. Effect of specimen collection rate and various procedural variables on the quality of biochemistry inpatient test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1989;113(4):383-386.

27. Nam JG, Park S, Hwang EJ, et al. Development and validation of deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm for malignant pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs. Radiology. 2019;290(1):218-228.

---

Word Count: 2,000

Disclosure: The author reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.